Yep. Thanks for the reply Alain.<div><br></div><div>That assumes the back channel is not a human supplying the info. ;-)</div><div><br></div><div>Is there a way to override this and provide the necessary receiver info/registration?<br>
</div><div>Or do I need to modify the source?</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>J</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Alain Knaff <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alain@knaff.lu">alain@knaff.lu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Justin Lipman wrote:<br>
&gt; Hi folks,<br>
&gt; I&#39;d like to use udp-sender with async and a unicast address instead of<br>
&gt; multicast so that unicast at the MAC layer is actually used.<br>
&gt; Ive tried using the pointopoint switch, but I get the message &quot;pointopoint<br>
&gt; mode set, and 0 participants instead of 1&quot;.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Is there a way to do this with udpcast?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thanks kindly.<br>
&gt; J<br>
<br>
</div></div>This is to be expected. Pointopoint only works if the receiver is known;<br>
however that is only possible if he may register with the sender.<br>
<br>
Async on the other hand means that there is no back channel by which the<br>
receiver may make itself known to the sender<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Alain<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>